SPECIAL WRITE-UP • ISSB GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY BASELINE The Chartered Accountant • November 2022 • Vol. 71 • pp. 28–30 (Journal pp. 492–494)

Better information enables better decision-making

SL
Sue Lloyd
Vice-Chair, International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) • Former Vice-Chair, IASB. She may be reached at eboard@icai.in

Core Principle & Foundational Role of Financial Reporting

“By establishing rigour and consistency in financial statements, the accountancy profession and accounting standards play an essential part in investor decision-making. As global markets, regulators, and world leaders turn their attention to addressing climate change, financial reporting once again has a foundational role to play.”

1. The Role of the IFRS Foundation & Dual-Board Architecture

At the heart of the IFRS Foundation is the belief that the provision of rigorous, reliable and comparable information enables informed economic decisions. This in turn promotes the proper functioning of capital markets, building trust, resilience, efficiency, transparency and accountability.

This belief formed the backbone of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The same belief sits at the core of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), and it has a very similar goal.

In the first two decades of its existence, the IFRS Foundation (through its independent standard-setting board, the IASB) transformed the global landscape of financial information by introducing IFRS Accounting Standards. The Standards have become the de facto global language of financial statements – trusted by investors worldwide and required for use by more than 140 jurisdictions.

Today, economic and investment decisions are increasingly incorporating sustainability information. There is strong international demand for high-quality, globally comparable information from companies on sustainability-related risks and opportunities. Responding to the need for such information, in 2021 the IFRS Foundation established the ISSB as a sister board to the IASB – responsible for developing a truly global baseline of sustainability disclosures to further inform economic and investment decisions.

Connectivity & Procedural Rigour Between Sister Boards:
Identical Transparent Due Process:

IFRS Accounting Standards and IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards are developed using the same rigorous, inclusive, and transparent due process – ensuring public consultation, accountability, and international stakeholder legitimacy.

Institutional Connectivity:

The two boards coordinate their technical agendas to enable accounting standards and sustainability disclosures to work seamlessly together, avoiding silos and ensuring coherence across corporate reporting.

Globally there is also a desire for change to support important transitions to address risks such as climate change. And more broadly, to achieve the public policy changes that governments desire, the financial markets have a crucial role to play. This was reflected in the commitments made about private sector investment at COP26 – notably, the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ).

2. Filling the Information Gap Using Accounting Methodology

“One aspect of the ISSB’s work is the role of sustainability information in meeting broader public policy objectives.”

The IASB notes in its conceptual framework that while the objective of its work is to meet the information needs of investors, lenders and other creditors, others may also find the information useful. In my former role on the IASB, parties beyond primary users were actively interested in financial statement disclosures – for example, prudential regulators maintain a keen interest in the reporting of expected credit losses as a complement to prudential capital requirements.

However, in the case of the ISSB, the level of interest is higher given the current state of reporting on sustainability matters. Essentially, many diverse stakeholders are relying on the ISSB’s work to fill an urgent information gap. The accountancy profession has a crucial part to play in ensuring this information gap is met.

In establishing our requirements, we looked to build on methods and systems established by accountants to ensure sustainability information is provided with the same rigour as financial information.

The nascent nature of sustainability reporting means that some of the very important factors that are necessary to support high quality reporting are still developing and being put in place – such as determining the appropriate level of assurance and ensuring that the appropriate supporting requirements are in place to support assurance. Whilst assurance requirements are determined at a jurisdictional level, the ISSB is working closely with the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and others to ensure its Standards are assurable, resulting in high-quality information to users.

Repurposing Well-Established IASB Concepts in Draft IFRS S1 (General Requirements):

Identical Reporting Entity Boundary:
The entity providing sustainability reporting must be the exact same reporting entity providing the financial statements.
Identical Primary User Focus:
Directly targeted at existing and potential investors, lenders, and other creditors assessing enterprise value.
Unified Materiality Definition:
Applies the exact definition of materiality as the IASB, allowing practitioners to leverage the IASB’s Materiality Practice Statement.
Standard-Setting Precedents:
Repurposes established guidance on interim reporting, comparative information, and a hierarchy to guide preparers when specific disclosures are absent.

All these proposals were modelled on similar requirements in IFRS Accounting Standards with as little change in wording as possible, ensuring that known concepts could be repurposed. With this common approach established, accountants are well placed to build on their current work and integrate new practices to support companies as they make the transition to ISSB standards.

“Accountants have a critical role to play in ensuring high-quality sustainability information is provided, which will form the basis of decision-making globally, enabling preparers and investors to respond to climate change.”

3. Rapid Rate of Progress & Recent Board Decisions

The ISSB was established only a year ago (November 2021). The rapid rate of progress maintained over the last twelve months, in keeping with urgent demands from global stakeholders, means that we are already making decisions to refine our standards and produce foundational work, with the intention of finalising our first Standards in 2023.

We follow a truly transparent and inclusive standard-setting process and encourage stakeholders to follow board meetings or listen to the official podcast. At our most recent board meeting, several significant decisions were approved:

Alignment on ‘Materiality’ & Terminology Refinements
Reconfirmed alignment with the IASB definition of “material”. Voted to remove references to the term ‘enterprise value’ – using the Integrated Reporting framework to support the concept’s articulation (a change in terminology, not approach). Voted to remove the term ‘significant’ and develop clear process guidance for identifying sustainability risks, opportunities, and disclosures.
Mandatory Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG Disclosures
Confirmed that standards will require Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas emissions disclosures under the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard. The board will deliver appropriate reliefs and guidance to support preparers with Scope 3 value chain calculations, ensuring feasibility across both developing and developed economies.
Global Baseline Toolkit & Proportionality
Evaluated a proportionality toolkit discussed at the September meeting to ensure the baseline remains truly global and adaptable to diverse institutional capabilities, preventing disproportionate burdens on smaller entities or emerging markets.
Partnership with ICAI & Indian Professionals
Committed to multi-organization capacity building and education. Specifically highlighted that the continued support of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) will be invaluable to leverage the extensive knowledge, insight, and expertise of Indian professionals.

“Accountants have a critical role to play in ensuring high-quality sustainability information is provided, which will form the basis of decision-making globally, enabling preparers and investors to respond to climate change.” ■■■

ICAI Official Announcement • Professional Development Committee November 2022

Extension of Last Date for Submitting MEF 2022-23 from October 28 to November 9, 2022

The Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF) for the year 2022-23 is live at https://meficai.org. Considering the various requests received from the members of ICAI, it has been decided by the Professional Development Committee to extend the last date for submission of Multipurpose Empanelment Form for the year 2022-23 from 28th October 2022 to 9th November 2022.

Important Note: NO FURTHER EXTENSION WOULD BE GIVEN for filing MEF 2022-23.

Members may refer to the “Advisory” while filling MEF 2022-23. However, MEF Applicants can write to the committee at the Complaint Module of MEF (available at https://app.meficai.org/complaints) or via email at mefpdc@icai.in for any clarification, if required.

— Professional Development Committee, ICAI