Corporate Finance and Position of Banks
Executive Perspective
The area of corporate finance is complex and intriguing. As the business organisations grew in size the area of corporate finance evolved to acquire quintessential position embracing all other functional areas. Primarily the area deals with sources of funds, capital structuring, investment decisions and other areas that involve finance. The primary objective of the corporate finance is to maximize the shareholder value through long and short term financial planning and the implementation of various strategies. There is reciprocal relationship between the area of corporate finance and economic growth. A growing economy assists in providing conducive environment for the corporates to progress. On the other hand better management of finances at micro level helps the business and contributes to the economy as a whole. In this article position of Banks as a constituent of economic system and contributor to the world of corporates is discussed. Read on…
1. Foundations of Corporate Finance & Financial Management
The finance field involves three complex interrelated areas as follows:
- Financial Systems: Consisting of money and capital markets that deal with financial institutions and the securities market.
- Investments Decisions: Made by individual and institutional investors.
- Financial Management: Involves financial decisions on Capital Budgeting / Long Term Investment decisions, Capital Structure involving Procurement of Funds and Working Capital Management to accomplish the goal of the organization i.e. to maximize the returns to all the stakeholders.
The key aspects of financial decision making relate to financing, investment, dividend and working capital Management. Therefore, financial management provides a conceptual and analytical framework for financial decision making. In corporates, finance primarily involves acquisition and allocation of funds and resources with the objective of maximizing the wealth of shareholders. Financial management deals with acquiring and deploying funds from various equity and debt instruments and their investment in the income generating assets to reap benefits.
At a primary level corporate finance helps in generation of funds both from internal and external sources in an economical manner to keep costs low. Funds from external sources are often acquired from venture capitalist, financial institutions or through tapping stock markets. Stock markets facilitate the raising of resources through equity shares, debentures and bonds to the general investing public besides Indian and foreign institutions. In order to leverage the equity, corporations approach banks and financial institutions for raising debt funds.
Corporate finance, as a next step, deals with investment of funds with the objective of increasing wealth of shareholders. It is the job of the Chief Financial Officer or financial controller to conduct both the functions of acquisition of the funds and their investment in a manner that maximises wealth of shareholders. CFO’s must balance the interest of owners, i.e., equity shareholders, creditors and other stake holders in a sustainable manner so that business grows without any adverse impact on society and ecology.
At times the corporations may deliberately choose to invest its resources in risky ventures in an effort to generate large profits for the shareholders. Per se, rewards are directly related to returns. Conversely, risky investment would reduce the perceived security of the Bonds resulting in increased rate of interest that the organisations pay to borrow money in future. Alternatively, if the business invests the resources too conservatively it would fail to maximize its value of business and the returns it provides. Thus, finance managers have to generate better returns from the investments while protecting the image of the company amongst the creditors, banks and bond holders. Banks provide credit to different sectors for the growth of economy.
2. Sectoral Deployment of Gross Bank Credit
Table 1 reflects the deployment of gross bank credit in various sectors for the growth of the economy across Agriculture, Industry, Services, and Retail segments:
| Sr. No & Item | Mar-18 (₹ Cr) | Mar-19 (₹ Cr) | Sep-19 (₹ Cr) | 2017-18* (%) | 2018-19** (%) | 2019-20^ (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Agriculture & Allied Activities | 11,93,400 | 13,25,824 | 12,06,850 | 7.2 | 11.1 | -0.6 |
| 2. Industry, of which: | 31,29,512 | 33,04,940 | 31,74,214 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 0.2 |
| 2.1 Micro & Small Industries | 4,18,225 | 4,38,392 | 4,53,908 | 8.8 | 4.8 | -0.4 |
| 2.2 Medium | 1,25,960 | 1,23,843 | 1,18,261 | 6.3 | -1.7 | -6.6 |
| 2.3 Large | 24,62,576 | 26,24,288 | 25,30,553 | 4.6 | 6.6 | 1.8 |
| 3. Services, of which: | 19,98,817 | 24,77,517 | 25,77,530 | 10.6 | 23.9 | 16.9 |
| 3.1 Trade | 5,19,398 | 5,83,613 | 5,83,264 | 7.5 | 12.4 | 12.7 |
| 3.2 Commercial Real Estate | 2,04,414 | 2,43,122 | 2,57,959 | 3.4 | 18.9 | 12.4 |
| 3.3 Tourism, Hotels & Restaurants | 52,095 | 56,194 | 56,766 | 9.9 | 7.9 | 3.2 |
| 3.4 Computer Software | 22,299 | 22,236 | 22,576 | 14.9 | -0.3 | -0.7 |
| 3.5 Non-Banking Financial Companies | 4,53,123 | 6,14,922 | 7,09,833 | 31.7 | 35.7 | 30.5 |
| 4. Retail Loans, of which: | 19,42,501 | 23,02,173 | 24,64,985 | 20.5 | 18.5 | 18.1 |
| 4.1 Housing Loans | 10,08,013 | 12,04,332 | 13,03,629 | 18.0 | 19.5 | 18.5 |
| 4.2 Consumer Durables | 19,036 | 9,195 | 8,902 | -11.6 | -51.7 | 110.2 |
| 4.3 Credit Card Receivables | 82,827 | 1,11,361 | 1,21,708 | 27.7 | 34.5 | 30.5 |
| 4.4 Auto Loans | 2,38,787 | 2,69,672 | 2,75,500 | 27.9 | 12.9 | 8.6 |
| 4.5 Education Loans | 74,883 | 76,210 | 78,237 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 4.6 Advances against Fixed Deposits (incl. FCNR (B), etc.) | 77,175 | 77,080 | 63,215 | 13.5 | -0.1 | -4.8 |
| 4.7 Advances to Individuals against Shares, Bonds, etc. | 6,385 | 9,339 | 8,655 | 26.1 | 46.3 | 33.4 |
| 4.8 Other Retail Loans | 4,35,396 | 5,44,983 | 6,05,139 | 28.2 | 25.2 | 24.2 |
| 5. Non-food Credit (1-4) | 83,61,294 | 94,71,480 | 36,71,836 | 10.5 | 13.3 | 8.6 |
| 6. Gross Bank Credit | 83,99,196 | 95,19,354 | 93,37,487 | 10.4 | 13.3 | 8.9 |
3. Global Financial Crisis & Macro-Economic Recovery
History has shown that India is able to deal with crisis in an effective manner sooner or later. The current pandemic has led to financial crises for many economies across the world. Businesses go through cycles of highs and lows. Earlier in the year 2008 a crisis shook the world triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, a global financial services firm. The US based firm filed for Chapter XI – Bankruptcy Protection following the massive exodus of most of its clients, substantial losses in its stock and devaluation by credit rating agencies. The debacle was largely contributed by involvement of financial services in the sub-prime mortgage.
The ten-year yield of Government Bonds in India dropped from 9% to 5% by the end of 2008. The Central Government expanded the Fiscal deficit to 2.5% of GDP in FY2008 to 6% in FY 2009 and 6.5% in FY 2010. As a result, India’s GDP growth rose to pre-crisis level in 2010. Consequent to global financial crisis of 2008 there was a catastrophic meltdown of the global financial markets. The impact on Indian economy was less severe because of our lower dependence on export markets and the sizable contribution to GDP is from domestic sources.
The report on Trend and Progress on Banking in India released by Reserve Bank of India provides graphic description of the status of Financial sector in the country. In the years following financial crisis the negative implication of stressed assets gradually reduced and new slippages were arrested. The Banking sector returned to profitability in the first half of 2019-20. Recapitalisation of public sector banks has helped in improving their capital ratios. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has helped in enhancing resolutions. The private sector Banks have maintained momentum in credit growth. However, overhang of NPAs still remains high and the turnaround would be expected only on reversal in macro economic conditions.
The Scheduled Commercial Banks (SCBs) recorded secular deceleration in deposits right from 2009-2010. However the trend was reversed and deposits constituted 77.6% of the total liabilities of SCBs at the end of March 2019. Demonetization induced a spike in deposits in 2016-17. The revival in the growth of loans and advances started in 2017-18 and the same momentum was maintained into 2018-19.
4. Non-Bank Sector, Spreads, and Contingent Liabilities
The outlook for the non-bank sector consisting of housing finance companies (HFCs) and non-banking finance companies (NBFCs) remained ‘negative’. During 2018-19 credit flow from HFCs and NBFCs declined; on the contrary a sharp rise in commercial paper issuances, higher accommodation provided by all India financial institutions and pick up in net-flows from foreign sources gained momentum. External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) and Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs) registered net inflows for the first time in four years. Further, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows grew at 18.9% in 2018-19. There is a need to improve the credit-to-GDP ratio to support higher economic expansion.
The size of contingent liabilities of all SCBs increased to 1.2x of their on-balance sheet position at end of March 2019, driven primarily by expansion in forward exchange contracts. Foreign Banks and private sector banks recorded significantly higher off-balance sheet exposure than Public Sector Banks.
Table 2: Cost of Funds and Return on Funds – Bank Group-wise (Per cent)
| Bank Group | Year | Cost of Deposits | Cost of Borrowings | Cost of Funds | Return on Advances | Return on Investments | Return on Funds | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSBs | 2017-18 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 7.8 | 7.1 | 7.5 | 2.5 |
| 2018-19 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 8.1 | 7.2 | 7.8 | 2.8 | |
| PVBs | 2017-18 | 4.9 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 9.5 | 6.9 | 8.8 | 3.6 |
| 2018-19 | 5.1 | 6.6 | 5.4 | 9.8 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 3.6 | |
| FBs | 2017-18 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 8.1 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 3.7 |
| 2018-19 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 7.2 | 3.6 | |
| All SCBs | 2017-18 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 8.3 | 7.0 | 7.9 | 2.8 |
| 2018-19 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 8.7 | 7.1 | 8.2 | 3.1 |
Table 3: Return on Assets (RoA) and Return on Equity (RoE) of SCBs (at end March) (Per cent)
| Bank Group | Public Sector Banks | Private Sector Banks | Foreign Banks | All Scheduled Commercial Banks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 |
| RoA | -0.84 | -0.65 | 1.14 | 0.63 | 1.34 | 1.56 | -0.15 | -0.09 |
| RoE | -14.62 | -11.44 | 10.12 | 5.45 | 7.16 | 8.77 | -2.81 | -1.85 |
5. Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality & IBC Resolution
The financial sector performance of SCBs reported positive net profits in H1 2019-2020 reflecting slackening provisioning requirements. The provision coverage ratio (PCR) improved to 61% by end September 2019 for all SCBs. The leverage of SCBs was reported at 6.6% at the end of March 2019, much above the prescription of 3% by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Further, the Basel III framework prescribes two minimum liquidity standards viz. the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR). The GNPA ratio of all SCBs declined in 2018-19 after rising for seven consecutive years as recognition of bad loans neared completion. Recovery of stressed assets improved during 2018-19.
Recovery of Stressed Assets: The banking sector continues to be marred by Non-performing assets. NPAs in larger borrower accounts [exposure of ₹ 5 crores or more] had contributed 91% of total GNPAs in 2017-18, after the RBI withdrew various legacy restructuring schemes. During 2018-19, propelled by resolutions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), recoveries contributed more than half of the total amount recovered. However, recovery rates yielded by major resolution mechanisms declined in 2018-19 especially through the SARFAESI mechanism.
Table 4: Classification of Loan Assets – Bank Group-wise (Amount in ₹ crore)
| Bank Group | End-March | Standard Assets | Sub-Standard Assets | Doubtful Assets | Loss Assets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | Per cent* | Amount | Per cent* | Amount | Per cent* | Amount | Per cent* | ||
| PSBs# | 2018 | 46,02,125 | 84.5 | 2,05,340 | 3.8 | 5,93,615 | 10.9 | 46,521 | 0.9 |
| 2019 | 50,86,874 | 87.8 | 1,37,377 | 2.4 | 5,06,492 | 8.7 | 66,239 | 1.1 | |
| PVBs^ | 2018 | 24,50,552 | 96.0 | 27,203 | 1.1 | 69,978 | 2.7 | 5,243 | 0.2 |
| 2019 | 31,03,581 | 95.2 | 42,440 | 1.3 | 1,04,696 | 3.2 | 9,576 | 0.3 | |
| FBs | 2018 | 3,49,475 | 96.2 | 3,831 | 1.1 | 8,364 | 2.3 | 1,635 | 0.5 |
| 2019 | 3,94,699 | 97.0 | 3,163 | 0.8 | 7,985 | 2.0 | 1,034 | 0.3 | |
| All SCBs** | 2018 | 74,02,152 | 88.1 | 2,36,374 | 2.8 | 6,71,957 | 8.0 | 53,398 | 0.6 |
| 2019 | 85,85,154 | 90.2 | 1,82,980 | 1.9 | 6,19,173 | 6.5 | 76,849 | 0.8 | |
The classification of Loan Assets Bank group-wise as reflected in Table 4 demonstrates that there is no appreciable growth in the percentage of Standard Assets. At the same time, the percentage of Sub-standard Assets recorded an improvement from 2.8% to 1.9%, but the amount of Loss Assets recorded a high level and increased from 0.6% to 0.8%. Cases referred for recovery through legal mechanisms shot up, whereas cleaning up of balance sheets via sales of stressed assets to Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs) decelerated on a YoY basis.
6. Financial Frauds in Banks: Risk Profile & Modus Operandi
From time to time banks have also faced financial frauds stressing their assets. Frauds particularly the large ones are difficult to detect, tend to get reported with a lag and have significant implications. The number of cases of fraud reported by Banks as well as the amount involved increased during 2018-19. In February 2018 the government issued a framework for timely detection, reporting and investigation relating to Frauds in PSBs. The framework required banks to evaluate NPA accounts exceeding ₹ 50 crores from the angle of possible frauds as a tool to unearth large fraudulent transactions at an early date. Consequently, there was a sharp rise in reported frauds in the year 2018-19.
Key Characteristics and Modus Operandi of Large-Value Bank Frauds:
- Concentration in Loan Portfolio: Frauds have been predominately occurring in the loan portfolio. Large-value frauds accounted for 86.4% of total fraud value.
- Diversion of Funds: Modus operandi involved diversion of funds by borrowers through associated & shell companies, accounting irregularities, and manipulating financial statements.
- Non-Consortium Current Accounts: Opening current accounts with banks outside the lending consortium without a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from lending banks helped fraudsters siphon proceeds.
- PSB Vulnerability: PSBs accounted for a bulk of frauds in 2018-19, comprising 55.4% of reported cases and 90.2% of the total amount involved, reflecting gaps in internal processes and operational risk controls.
7. Endnote & The Role of Chartered Accountants
The banking system plays a crucial role in the growth of Indian economy. The problems of banks, accentuated by a variety of factors, can be improved by putting proper governance mechanisms in place. Chartered Accountants functioning diligently and following well established standards can also help the banks.
“The chartered accountants as auditors or as employees need to work responsibly, diligently and truthfully to strengthen the health of these financial institutions. Banks are considered to be the life-blood of the economy and the profession can play an important role in maintaining the financial life of a business.”