The Chartered Accountant • Journal of ICAI April 2022 • Vol. 70 • No. 10 • pp. 29–32 (Journal pp. 1201–1204)
Theme Article

Empowering the Profession: Building Excellence and Strengthening Stakeholder’s Confidence

MF

CA. Manoj Fadnis

Past President, The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) & Past President, Confederation of Asian and Pacific Accountants (CAPA) • Contact: eboard@icai.in

Executive Synopsis & The Speed of Acceleration

The speed at which changes are occurring all across society is ever accelerating. Unless one adopts these changes at the same pace, redundancy is bound to increase. This principle applies equally to professionals. For an individual professional, continuous learning of technical matters and updating technological skills is inevitable. At the same time, delivering professional services at competitive pricing is essential in the modern commercial world. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has been playing a proactive role in empowering the profession and simultaneously strengthening stakeholders’ confidence.

1

Advertisement & Code of Ethics: Evolution from Strict Prohibition to Regulated Empowerment

“A man must stand erect, and not be kept erect by others.”

— Marcus Aurelius

Considering the age-old basic differences between business and profession, the Code of Ethics has always been more rigidly applied to professionals. Advertisements and solicitations have traditionally been looked down upon for a professional. However, the changing dynamics of the social environment and the increasing complexities of trade and commerce required re-thinking on the subject.

Statutory Milestones in Professional Advertisement

  • Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Act, 2006 (w.e.f. 17th November 2006): A landmark milestone was achieved when lawmakers inserted a proviso to Clause (7) of Part 1 of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (which deals with professional misconduct regarding advertisement). Under this proviso, a member in practice may advertise through a write-up setting out the services provided by him or his firm and particulars of his firm, subject to guidelines issued by the Council of the ICAI.
  • Strengthening Service Sector Competitiveness: The importance of advertisement must be appreciated within the broader macroeconomic architecture. Because the service sector contributes a significant share of India’s GDP, the competitiveness of the sector needed strengthening. Consequently, while the law permitted limited, dignified advertisement, the Council simultaneously deleted provisions prohibiting undercutting of fees.
  • Guidelines Evolution (2008 to 2020) & Social Media Integration: The first set of comprehensive advertisement guidelines was issued in 2008 and subsequently revised in 2020. The current guidelines formally recognize the ubiquitous effect and impact of social media, extending pragmatic relaxations to practicing members. The Council maintains vigilant oversight: while practices once prohibited may become essential tomorrow, any practice found to be misleading or detrimental to professional standing is sternly discarded.
2

Multi-Disciplinary Firms (MDFs): Legislative Evolution & Corporate Re-engineering

The strategic imperative of multi-disciplinary firms is universally acknowledged. The concept originally took root as part of the Capacity Building Measures adopted by the Council of the ICAI in 2004. However, comprehensive operational guidelines were finalized only in 2021, following extensive legislative and regulatory overhauls across corporate and professional statutes.

Statute / Provision Historical Position Modern Liberalized Position
Companies Act Framework Section 226(1) of Companies Act, 1956: Mandated that for a firm to be appointed as auditor, all the partners practising in India had to be qualified Chartered Accountants. Section 141(1) of Companies Act, 2013: Provides that a firm whereof a majority of partners practising in India are qualified CAs may be appointed as auditor by its firm name. This statutory shift paved the legal pathway for Multi-Disciplinary Firms.
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 Section 2(2) (Original): A member was deemed to be in practice only when practicing individually or in partnership exclusively with chartered accountants. Multi-disciplinary practice was completely unrecognized. Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Act, 2011 (w.e.f. 01.02.2012): Inserted the phrase “or in partnership with members of such other recognised professions as may be prescribed,” formally authorizing cross-professional partnerships.
Regulatory Guidelines Capacity Building concept formulated in 2004, but held in abeyance pending statutory harmonization. Comprehensive MDF Guidelines issued by ICAI in 2021; parallel guidelines from companion statutory professional bodies are under active formulation.

Catalysts Driving Multi-Disciplinary Practice in the Corporate Ecosystem

Far-reaching developments have reshaped corporate legislation since the turn of the century:

  • Modern Statutory Frameworks: The Competition Act, 2002, the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Act, 2008, the Companies Act, 2013, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
  • Registered Valuers Regime: Institutionalized through Section 247 of the Companies Act, 2013 (notified w.e.f. 18th October 2017), requiring specialized technical and financial valuation expertise.
  • Insolvency & Restructuring: IBC processes mandate multi-disciplinary teams uniting accountants, legal luminaries, engineers, and operational turnaround specialists to manage corporate insolvency resolution.
  • Banking NPAs & Forensic Audits: Escalating non-performing assets (NPAs) across the banking system, accompanied by alleged rampant diversion of funds to related parties, have spurred unprecedented demand for multi-disciplinary forensic investigations.
  • Structural Shift in Firm Composition: Professional demand is shifting dynamically from pure compliance audit toward holistic consultancy. It is widely acknowledged globally that future accounting firms will employ a greater proportion of non-accountants than traditional accountants.
3

Non-Audit Services (NAS): Section 144 Rigidity vs. International Independence Architecture

While advisory and consultancy services expand rapidly, statutory audit remains under sharp, vigilant focus—and rightly so. Public and stakeholder trust in the audit profession must be continuously reinforced. A primary arena of intense scrutiny is the provision of Non-Audit Services (NAS) by statutory auditors.

ICAI’s Proactive Pre-emptive Response (2002)

In the immediate wake of the global Enron collapse in 2001–02, ICAI responded swiftly. In 2002, the Council issued a binding notification capping non-audit fees, prohibiting audit firms from accepting non-audit fees in excess of statutory audit fees in the case of listed and other specified entities. This regulatory action preceded the statutory codification of Section 144 in the Companies Act, 2013 by more than a decade.

Critical Comparative Analysis: Section 144 vs. International Code of Ethics

Rigidities of Section 144 (Companies Act, 2013)

  • Blanket Applicability: Prohibits specified services to all audit clients without distinguishing between Public Interest Entities (PIEs/listed firms) and small, closely-held private companies.
  • Prohibited List: Accounting/bookkeeping, internal audit, financial information systems design/implementation, actuarial, investment advisory, investment banking, outsourced financial services, and undefined “management services”.
  • Ambiguity: The term “management services” remains undefined in statute, generating regulatory hesitation.

International Code of Ethics (IESBA / Global)

  • Principle-Based Distinction: Prohibits assuming “management responsibility”, but permits service provision if decision-making and operational responsibility remain strictly with the auditee.
  • Developed Economy Precedents: Routine processing (e.g., payroll processing, recording mechanical accounting entries) is permissible if the firm exercises no independent decision-making authority.
  • Proportionality: Tailors restrictions to whether public interest is affected.

Administrative Services (Feb 2020) & The Two-Pronged Harmonization Proposal

In February 2020, the Council notified “Administrative Services” under Management Consultancy and Other Services as a permissible service that can be rendered by practicing CAs. Because ICAI adopted the International Code of Ethics, such services are currently permissible for non-company audit clients, while strictly banned for corporate clients under Section 144. To resolve this dilemma, CA. Manoj Fadnis puts forward a coherent reform agenda:

  1. Statutory Primacy & Universal Ethical Standards: Recognizing that the law formulated by Parliament is supreme, the Council should consider extending the prohibition on management services to non-company audit clients as well. Professional ethical standards should govern substance uniformly and not vary arbitrarily based on the client’s legal constitution.
  2. Carve-Out for Small Entities: Simultaneously, a policy debate should be initiated to exempt small companies (as defined in the Companies Act) from the stringent blanket prohibitions of Section 144. Where no public interest is at stake, banning routine, non-conflicting administrative and accounting support services serves no economic or governance logic.
4

Auditor Rotation: Dual Mandate (Firm vs. Partner) & Case for Rationalization

The Companies Act, 2013 enacted mandatory firm rotation for listed companies and prescribed classes of companies (maximum tenure of two terms of five consecutive years, followed by a mandatory five-year cooling-off period). Similarly, statutory auditor rotation is prescribed for Public Sector Banks (PSBs), Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), and financial institutions.

The Ethical Rationale for Partner Rotation (ICAI Code of Ethics Vol. I)

“A self-interest threat might be created as a result of an individual’s concern about losing a longstanding client or an interest in maintaining a close personal relationship with a member of senior management or those charged with governance. Such a threat might influence the individual’s judgment inappropriately.”

Rotation of firms and partners improves auditor independence and strengthens public perception. Independence is fundamentally a state of mind, but objective regulatory safeguards enhance stakeholder faith.

The Case for Regulatory Relaxation in Partner Rotation

It is vital to recognize that the International Code of Ethics does not mandate firm rotation; its safeguards are strictly confined to partner rotation. The Indian regulatory framework is thus far more stringent, simultaneously imposing statutory firm rotation within a maximum 10-year horizon alongside internal partner rotation.

Logical Redundancy: The fundamental ethical premise justifying partner rotation—mitigating the self-interest threat of losing an audit client—becomes inapplicable when the entire firm is statutorily mandated to rotate out. Therefore, relaxing partner rotation where firm rotation already exists is a viable area for Council review.

5

Networking of CA Firms: Overcoming Bottlenecks & SMP Empowerment

Networking among CA firms was conceptualized as a cornerstone policy to empower Small and Medium Practitioners (SMPs), elevating their collective capacity to execute multi-location engagements and deliver specialized multi-disciplinary services. However, networking in India has not achieved its intended scale.

Core Bottleneck in Networking

Under both ICAI Networking Guidelines and Section 144 of the Companies Act, if one networked firm is appointed as statutory auditor, all other network affiliates are disqualified from undertaking internal audits or providing consultancy services for that corporate client. This rigid restriction discourages ambitious firms from joining formal networks.

Proposed Tender Scoring Incentive

To make networking commercially attractive, public procurement authorities and institutional tender bodies should award additional scoring points to networked firms during bid evaluations. As multi-disciplinary consultancy assignments multiply, this will incentivize SMPs to amalgamate and form resilient networks.

Pragmatic International Affiliations: In an interconnected global economy, networking guidelines for affiliations with firms outside India must be pragmatic. While full compliance with domestic Indian statutes remains paramount, domestic firms must adopt global best practices to seize overseas opportunities and compete effectively on the international stage.

6

Investing in Technology: ICAI Digital Maturity Model & Software Subsidies

Indian CA firms must substantially augment their investments in technology. Advanced automated audit tools and data analytics platforms are capital-intensive and historically remained out of reach for small and medium practices.

DMM

ICAI Digital Maturity Model (DMM) & Software Democratization

The Digital Maturity Model (DMM) formulated by ICAI provides a structured self-evaluation benchmark for firms to measure digital adoption across audit documentation, workflow management, and client communication.

To resolve cost barriers, ICAI has launched strategic initiatives to centrally procure high-end automated audit tools and license them affordably to practicing firms. This democratization of audit technology will directly enhance audit quality, rigor, and documentation standards across SMPs.

Conclusion: Collective Reputation and Stakeholder Confidence

Each one of us as a member of the ICAI must bear in mind that the image of the profession is the reflection of the sum total of the image of what each one of us does individually. Excelling in whichever area we practice or serve is the minimum contribution that can be rendered in increasing the stakeholders’ confidence in the profession.

The Chartered Accountant • April 2022 Empowering the Profession • Journal pp. 1201–1204