The Chartered Accountant • Journal of ICAI April 2022 • Vol. 70 • No. 10 • pp. 38–40 (Journal pp. 1210–1212)
Theme Article

Role of FRRB as Improving Financial Reporting Practices

DK

CA. Durgesh Kumar Kabra

Central Council Member, ICAI • durgeshkabra@gmail.com

AC

CA. Abhay Chhajed

Central Council Member, ICAI • abhay.chhajed@icai.in

Executive Synopsis & Genesis of FRRB (July 2002)

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), in light of the changing global scenario and experience gained therefrom, felt the acute need for a separate, dedicated, and independent wing that could undertake the review of general-purpose financial statements of enterprises with the objective of examining financial reporting non-compliances. The core idea was to guarantee the quality of financial reporting. Therefore, the Council of the Institute established the Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB / Board) in July 2002 with an objective to develop and maintain an environment of sound financial reporting practices and to improve transparency in reporting, which is paramount to promoting investor confidence in audited financial statements.

1

Composition and Institutional Independence of the Board

FRRB comprises members from the Central Council of the ICAI, Government nominees, and high-level representatives from major national regulatory and statutory oversight authorities from time to time:

SEBI

Securities and Exchange Board of India representation ensuring capital market and public securities oversight.

C&AGI

Office of Comptroller and Auditor General of India, bringing public sector audit rigor and sovereign reporting scrutiny.

IRDAI

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, supervising solvency, actuarial disclosures, and insurer compliance.

CBDT

Central Board of Direct Taxes, ensuring alignment with fiscal statutory compliances and tax accounting principles.

Unique Institutional Safeguards of Independence

The composition of the Board represents a broad spectrum of professional and regulatory experience. The Board comprises members with significant expertise in the field, and they work strictly under confidentiality covenants.

With the view to maintain the uncompromised independence of the Board, it neither co-opts members nor are the President, ICAI and Vice-President, ICAI appointed as ex-officio members to the Board, unlike other standing committees of the ICAI.

2

Scope of Work and Clear Operational Boundaries

FRRB reviews the general-purpose financial statements of enterprises and the auditor’s report thereon with a view to determine, to the extent possible:

  • Compliance with GAAP: Compliance with the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP, Accounting Standards, and Ind AS) in the preparation and presentation of financial statements.
  • Compliance with Statutory Disclosures: Compliance with the disclosure requirements prescribed by regulatory bodies, statutes, and rules and regulations relevant to the enterprise (such as the Companies Act, SEBI LODR Regulations, RBI Prudential Norms, IRDAI Regulations).
  • Compliance with Auditor Reporting Obligations: Compliance with the statutory and professional reporting obligations of the auditor under Standards on Auditing (SAs) and legislative mandates.

Operational Boundaries and Non-Judicial Nature

Published Financial Statements Only: The Board restricts its reviews exclusively to published financial statements and does not carry out a re-audit or review how the audit has been conducted by the auditors concerned (i.e., it does not inspect working papers or audit files).

Non-Judicial Character: The review conducted by the Board is neither a judicial proceeding nor a quasi-judicial proceeding; rather, it functions as a technical and professional compliance assessment mechanism.

3

Dual Selection Methodology for Review of Enterprises

The Board reviews general-purpose financial statements and auditor’s reports selected through two distinct channels:

i. Suo Moto Selection

For suo moto reviews, enterprises are shortlisted on the basis of criteria formulated and decided by the Board from time to time.

The required number of enterprises is selected using a scientific random sampling method to ensure objective, unbiased coverage across diverse industries and market capitalizations.

ii. Special Cases Selection

  • Regulatory References: On the basis of formal references made by external regulatory authorities, including the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Election Commission of India (ECI), etc.
  • Media Reports: Specific cases where serious accounting irregularities and financial reporting failures in the financial statements are widely reported in the media.
4

The Robust Three-Tier Review Process

To guarantee the utmost technical accuracy, objectivity, and procedural rigor, the Board deploys a structured Three-Tier Review Mechanism:

T1

Stage 1: Preliminary Review by Independent Technical Reviewer

Preliminary review is undertaken by an independent Technical Reviewer (TR) empanelled with the Board. The Technical Reviewer meticulously examines published financial statements against relevant GAAP, statutory disclosure mandates, and auditing standards, compiling an in-depth preliminary review report.

T2

Stage 2: Scrutiny by Financial Reporting Review Groups (FRRGs)

The preliminary report prepared by the Technical Reviewer is submitted to a Financial Reporting Review Group (FRRG). The group critically examines the observations, verifies the statutory interpretations, evaluates the materiality of observations, and prepares an integrated review group report.

T3

Stage 3: Final Adjudication by Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB)

Finally, the report of the Financial Reporting Review Group along with the preliminary review report of the Technical Reviewer is placed before the apex Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB). The Board deliberates upon the findings to take final institutional decisions.

5

Actions Taken by FRRB on Review Findings

Based on the outcome of the three-tier review, the Board initiates calibrated, targeted actions with respect to both statutory auditors and corporate management:

Actions with Respect to Auditors

Material Non-Compliances (Affecting True & Fair View)

In cases of material non-compliance that affect the true and fair view of the financial statements, such matters are formally referred to the Director (Discipline) of the ICAI for initiating appropriate disciplinary proceedings against the auditor under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

Non-Material Non-Compliances (Corrective Advisories)

Where the Board observes that the non-compliances are not material and do not affect the true and fair view of financial statements, it brings such issues to the attention of the concerned auditor as a corrective measure. These advisories motivate auditors to follow quality practices and uphold the highest sense of professionalism.

Actions with Respect to Enterprise Management

In cases of material non-compliances, the Board informs irregularities to the concerned external statutory and sector regulatory bodies relevant to the enterprise for initiating appropriate administrative, civil, or penal action:

  • Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)
  • Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
  • Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
  • Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA)
  • Election Commission of India (ECI) and other relevant bodies
6

Statistics of Review of General-Purpose Financial Statements

Till date, the Financial Reporting Review Board has conducted exhaustive reviews of 986 Financial Statements of various enterprises, yielding substantial regulatory outcomes:

986 Total Statements Reviewed 757 Suo Moto • 229 Special Cases
165 Referred to Director (Discipline) Material Non-Compliances
158 Sent to Regulators MCA, SEBI, IRDA, RBI, etc.
618 Corrective Advisories Issued Non-Material Disclosures
Performance Indicator / Metric Head Cumulative Statistics
Suo Moto Reviews (Selected via Random Sampling) 757 cases
Special Cases Reviews (Regulatory References & Media Reports) 229 cases
Total Financial Statements Reviewed 986 cases
Cases Referred to Director (Discipline) of ICAI 165 cases
Cases Referred to External Statutory Regulators (MCA, SEBI, IRDA, RBI, etc.) 158 cases
Advisories Issued to Auditors to Exercise Greater Care in Future Engagements 618 cases
7

The Impact FRRB is Making: Capacity Building & Publications

FRRB has been playing a vital role in strengthening best accounting and auditing practices amongst members and other stakeholders. Beyond referral to disciplinary bodies and statutory regulators, the Board acts as a proactive educational engine for the profession through multifaceted knowledge dissemination initiatives:

Direct Member Advisories & Seminars

The Board sends personalized advisories to members on specific non-compliances observed in financial statements audited by them. These advisories directly assist members in implementing corrective quality safeguards in their subsequent engagements.

The Board regularly conducts interactive Awareness Programmes, Seminars, and Technical Workshops nationwide on emerging nuances of financial reporting, standard interpretations, and disclosure rigor.

Digital Outreach: ‘Did You Know’ Series

To broaden professional awareness in the digital age, the Board on a regular basis posts commonly observed financial reporting and disclosure non-compliances under the popular ‘Did You Know’ series on its Twitter handle. This initiative provides rapid, bite-sized updates for statutory auditors as well as corporate preparers of financial statements.

Authoritative Publications of the Board

The Board systematically compiles non-compliances observed during the course of reviews and releases them to the public in the form of authoritative research publications:

  • Three Volumes: ‘Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements’ (covering traditional Accounting Standards and statutory framework requirements).
  • One Dedicated Volume: ‘Study on Compliance of Financial Reporting Requirements (Ind AS Framework)’ (analyzing complex compliance nuances under Indian Accounting Standards converged with IFRS).

Conclusion: Twenty Years of Proactive Self-Regulation

FRRB is a proactive self-regulatory mechanism within the ICAI to strengthen financial reporting practices. After functioning for more than twenty years, the FRRB is firmly established as an important and influential tool to bring transparency to financial reporting. Its presence has been acknowledged across various quarters of society, including members of the Institute and statutory regulatory authorities. The ongoing task of undertaking rigorous reviews by the Board will definitely continue to strengthen the accounting and financial reporting ecosystem across the country.

The Chartered Accountant • April 2022 Financial Reporting Review Board • Journal pp. 1210–1212