The Chartered Accountant • Journal of ICAI November 2021 • Vol. 70 • No. 5 • pp. 84–88 (Journal pp. 596–600)
Finance • Real Estate & Capital Market Restructuring

SPAC: Solutions to Indian Housing Finance Sector

SK

CA. Satheesh K V

Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. Contact: kvsatheesh@gmail.com

MR

Dr. MS Raju

Director (Rtd), School of Management and Entrepreneurship, KUFOS, Ernakulam. Contact: eboard@icai.in

1. The Indian Housing Crisis: 4.58 Lakh Stalled Homes

Big-ticket industrial loans, luxury housing projects, and commercial loans started displaying symptoms of failure in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and are currently in an acutely weakened state due to a severe liquidity crunch. Crucially, most of these accounts were classified as standard performing assets until lockdowns commenced.

While seasoned listed corporations can access capital markets with relative ease, raising primary capital remains a herculean task for unlisted real estate developers. Most residential construction companies in India operate as unlisted entities, confined to localized demographic micro-markets without an all-India corporate presence.

The Stalled Project Reality: Metro vs. All-India Figures

  • Seven Major Metros (Delhi-NCR, MMR, Chennai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune): Nearly 2.20 lakh housing units worth Rs 1.56 lakh crore, where construction commenced on or before 2011, remain stalled and incomplete.
  • All-India Total: Around 4.58 lakh housing units stand incomplete and stalled across the nation as of March 2020.
  • Government SWAMIH Fund Package: The Union Finance Minister announced a support package of Rs 25,000 crore to revive stalled projects. Under this mechanism, the Central Government committed Rs 10,000 crore, with the remaining capital syndicated via state-owned Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and State Bank of India (SBI) through a SEBI-registered Category II Alternative Investment Fund (AIF).

However, given the gargantuan scale of capital required to rescue lakhs of stranded middle-class home buyers, public budget allocations alone cannot suffice. The government must explore innovative capital market alternatives such as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs).

2. Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC): Anatomy & Operational Life Cycle

A SPAC is a publicly traded, developmental-stage company that possesses no commercial operations or established business plan of its own. It is formed strictly to raise capital through an Initial Public Offering (IPO) with the explicit objective of merging with or acquiring an existing operating business entity.

SPACs perform as cash-rich enterprises scouting for prime investment opportunities with substantial funds in their kitty—hence popularly termed “Blank Cheque Companies”. Globally, SPACs achieved explosive growth in European capital markets and the United States. In 2020 alone, more than 50 SPACs registered in the USA, raising approximately $21.50 billion from public markets, typically structured to complete an acquisition within 18 to 24 months.

The Seven Phases of a SPAC Deal Lifecycle

  1. Sponsor Backing & Formation: Formed and led by seasoned private equity investors, venture capitalists, and industry veterans with proven domain track records.
  2. Blind Pool Formation: At incorporation, the SPAC identifies no specific acquisition target to the public; internal investment avenues remain undisclosed during the IPO.
  3. Underwritten IPO: Shares and warrants are underwritten by investment banks or privately placed with institutional anchors before broader public subscription.
  4. Two-Year Trust Escrow: IPO proceeds are quarantined in interest-bearing government securities or trust escrow accounts for a maximum period of 2 years. Interest earned, net of administrative expenses, accrues toward the acquisition.
  5. Mandatory Liquidation Safety Net: If the management fails to consummate a qualifying business combination within the 2-year window, the SPAC is dissolved and 100% of escrowed funds are returned pro-rata to public investors.
  6. De-SPAC Business Combination: Upon shareholder approval, the target company merges into the SPAC, enabling the operating business to continue as a publicly traded company.
  7. Fast-Track Listing Benefits: Unlisted operating targets achieve listed status rapidly, bypassing traditional IPO roadshows, book-building delays, underwriting discounts, and market volatility.

Chart 1: Operational Capital Flow in a SPAC Architecture

Public Investors & Sponsors ➔ Subscribe to Shares / Warrants ➔ SPAC Issuer Entity ➔ Execution of Trust Agreement & Appointment of Trustee/Board ➔ IPO Proceeds held in Escrow ➔ Disbursed as Acquisition Consideration to Target Operating Company upon De-SPAC closing.

3. Indian Regulatory Bottlenecks: Detrimental Laws Inhibiting Domestic SPACs

Currently, SPACs cannot be incorporated or listed domestically in India due to conflicting statutory frameworks that penalize non-operating shell structures:

Statutory Enactment Conflicting Legal Provision Practical Impediment to SPACs
Companies Act, 2013
Section 4 (MoA Objects)
Requirement to define specific commercial object clauses in Memorandum. A SPAC is formed with an open-ended mandate without defined commercial operations, creating ambiguity under Section 4.
Companies Act, 2013
Section 248 (Strike-Off)
Failure to commence business within 1 year or inoperation for 2 preceding FYs triggers RoC strike-off. A SPAC legitimately waits 18–24 months to identify an optimal target, exposing it to automatic deregistration unless granted dormant status u/s 455.
SEBI (ICDR) Regulations
Profitability Route / Reg 26
Mandates ₹3 cr net tangible assets (3 yrs), ₹15 cr pre-tax operating profit (3 of 5 yrs), and ₹1 cr net worth (3 yrs). Newly incorporated SPAC shell entities possess zero operational track record, making public IPO qualification impossible under existing rules.
SEBI (SAST) Takeover Regulations, 2011 Strict triggers for open offers upon acquiring voting rights or control. Applicable if the target is listed, imposing stringent caps on acquired control and stretching transaction timelines.
FEMA Regulations, 2018
Cross-Border Mergers
Overseas investment and inbound/outbound mergers require multistage RBI approvals. Lengthy regulatory clearances severely prolong the 18–24 month deal window when cross-border structures are deployed.
Stock Exchange Rules
NSE / BSE / Overseas
Lack of specialized SPAC listing chapters (contrast: LSE reverse merger delisting rules; NASDAQ $5M asset test). Absence of standardized domestic exchange guidelines leaves promoters without a clear listing roadmap.
Shareholder Redemption Indian company law lacks flexible statutory redemption of public equity prior to de-SPAC. US provisions guaranteeing refund of invested capital protect investor liquidity; absence in India weakens retail confidence.
Income-tax Act, 1961
Capital Gains Tax
Transfer of Indian shares for cash or foreign shares triggers capital gains tax. Foreign SPAC deals trigger capital gains for Indian promoters; domestic SPACs could enjoy tax neutrality under Section 47 amalgamation.

4. Indian Precedents: Cross-Border Listings via US SPACs

In the absence of a domestic framework, prominent Indian enterprises successfully utilized the US SPAC corridor to access global capital on NASDAQ:

1. ReNew Power ➔ RMG Acquisition Corp II

India’s premier renewable energy champion combined with US-based SPAC RMG Acquisition Corporation II (RMG II), achieving a landmark public listing on NASDAQ.

2. Videocon D2H ➔ Silver Eagle Acquisition

Listed on NASDAQ via reverse merger with Silver Eagle Acquisition Corporation, co-founded by Harry Sloan (former MGM chief) and Jeff Sagansky, issuing American Depositary Shares (ADSs).

3. Yatra Online ➔ Terrapin 3 Acquisition Corp

Leading Indian travel portal Yatra.com achieved a NASDAQ listing via reverse merger with Terrapin 3 Acquisition Corp (TRTL) underwritten by Deutsche Bank through its US holding firm.

5. Deploying SPACs in the Housing Sector: Restructuring Stressed Real Estate

SEBI’s Primary Market Advisory Committee (PMAC) has constituted a Committee of Experts (COE) to evaluate the regulatory feasibility of introducing SPAC frameworks in India. While startups are natural beneficiaries, the stalled housing sector represents the most urgent candidate for SPAC intervention.

Housing Finance Institutions (HFIs) and banks hold substantial exposure in incomplete real estate projects, where loans have degenerated into Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) with inadequate security to enforce mortgages. A formalized, sector-focused Housing SPAC can operate on a pan-India basis, achieving economies of scale in material procurement, engineering management, construction costs, and professional oversight.

Table 1: Location-Specific Breakdown of Delayed Units & Incomplete Housing Projects in India

State / Metropolitan Cluster Number of Stuck Units State / Metropolitan Cluster Number of Stuck Units
Delhi-NCR Region 83,470 Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) 43,449
Rest of Maharashtra 12,644 Coimbatore & Suburbs 11,954
Chennai 9,650 Hyderabad 8,131
Kolkata 5,468 Bengaluru 4,150
Rest of Tamil Nadu 3,214 Rest of Karnataka 2,817
Goa 3,864 Gujarat (Ahmedabad, Rajkot) 3,864
Madhya Pradesh (Indore, Bhopal) 1,844 Raipur, Chhattisgarh 1,098
Bhubaneswar, Cuttack & Odisha 1,028 Dehradun, Uttarakhand 978
Bihar (Patna) 967 Uttar Pradesh (Lucknow) 887
Guwahati, Assam 814 Jharkhand 718
Patiala, Amritsar, Punjab 371 Rest of Kerala 384
Telangana (Ex-Hyd) 271 West Bengal (Asansol, Haldia) 214
Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 117 Other Outlying Locations 103

Source: Consolidated from industry research reports (Economic Times, JLL, MagicBricks, Times of India, Business Standard).

National Urban Housing Shortage: The RICS – Knight Frank Report

As evaluated in the research report “Brick by Brick” prepared by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) in association with international property consultant Knight Frank: India is projected to require an additional 25 million affordable houses by the year 2030. As of July 2019, the urban housing deficit stood at approximately 10 million units, predominantly concentrated within the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) and Lower Income Group (LIG) segments. Completing partially constructed homes is an urgent national priority.

The top three clusters—Delhi-NCR (83,470 units), MMR (43,449 units), and other parts of Maharashtra (12,644 units)—aggregate to approximately 1.40 lakh stalled units. If a specialized Housing SPAC focuses solely on Delhi-NCR and MMR, it could resolve and deliver 1.27 lakh homes through operational synergies, clustered material procurement, and localized project execution.

6. Conclusion & Policy Recommendations: A Pilot Sandbox for Stalled Housing

The globally proven SPAC structure should be actively evaluated for implementation in India, at least for capital-starved priority sectors requiring urgent intervention—namely housing construction, infrastructure development, rural healthcare, and tech start-ups.

Regulators can test the waters by formulating sector-specific regulatory sandboxes. Based on early performance and monitoring, compliance parameters can be calibrated before expanding across broader industries.

Quantifiable Social & Financial Impact of a 20% SPAC Resolution

Even if domestic SPACs achieve a modest 20% resolution rate across the Delhi-NCR, MMR, and Maharashtra clusters, approximately 25,000 completed homes would be delivered to families. This would release thousands of crores in frozen HFI loans, turn stressed non-performing assets back into cash-generating units, and provide a permanent institutional panacea for incomplete properties in India.

References

  1. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, Special Purpose Acquisition Companies: An Introduction.
  2. Annual Report 2019-2020, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA), Government of India; Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi.
  3. National Housing Bank (NHB), Annual Report – Report on Trend and Progress of Housing in India 2019-2020.
  4. National Stock Exchange of India (NSE), Annual Report 2020.
The Chartered Accountant • Journal of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI)
November 2021 Issue • Vol. 70 • No. 5 • pp. 84–88 (Journal pp. 596–600)